Groklaw is reporting that Apple has won a total and permanent injunction against Psystar, the injunction which can be seen in whole here [PDF] rules the following:
- Copying, selling, offering to sell, distributing, or creating derivative works of plaintiffs copyrighted Mac OS X software without authorization from the copyright holder;
- Intentionally inducing, aiding, assisting, abetting, or encouraging any other person or entity to infringe plaintiffs copyrighted Mac OS X software;
- Circumventing any technological measure that effectively controls access to plaintiffs copyrighted Mac OS X software, including, but not limited to, the technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers;
- Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to plaintiffs copyrighted Mac OS X software, including, but not limited to, the technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers;
- Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively protects the rights held by plaintiff under the Copyright Act with respect to its copyrighted Mac OS X software.
Judge Alsup stated in the injunction that he doesn't want to see Psystar "engage in defiant or unreasonable conduct". Psystar has until December 31st 2009 to comply and Psystar "must immediately begin this process, and take the quickest path to compliance; thus, if compliance can be achieved within one hour after this order is filed, defendant shall reasonably see it done."
Additionally Psystar must "immediately destroy any technology, product, device, component, or part thereof in its custody or control that has been used to circumvent any technological protection measure that effectively controls access to plaintiff’s copyrighted Mac OS X software, or effectively protects the rights held by plaintiff under the Copyright Act with respect to its copyrighted Mac OS X software".