The appellate case is moving along with both parties having filed their mandatory Mediation Questionnaires. Other than both agreeing that mediation would be futile, the filings are pretty vanilla with the exception of the following unintentional humour (from Psystar's filing):
"Psystar sought to provide a lower cost, higher quality alternative to Apple's hardware."
Higher quality? Is that why the man who won the Psystar video contest is so pleased with the quality of his purchase?
And this redefinition of the truth:
"Apple sued Psystar for copyright infringement and violations of the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA claiming that selling hardware capable of running OS X (and hence competing with Apple in the market for personal computers) is illegal."
And we thought that Steve Jobs had a reality distortion field. Too bad for Psystar, no one seems to be buying theirs. (double-meaning intended)
A copy of Apple's filing can be found here.
In addition to her position as Assistant Editor at World of Apple, dizzle runs idrankthekoolaid, an Apple fangrl satire blog, and is an Administrator and Hostess at MyAppleSpace and their vidcast MASTv.